• Home
  • About
  • Terms
  • RSS

Example 4,323 of the Risks of Blogging and Facebook-ing

September 23rd, 2009 | By David Elkanich

The ABA Online Journal has an interesting article discussing when lawyers become respondents in bar matters or defendants in civil cases. This blog regularly discusses the risks inherent in using social networking cites, and cautions lawyers to carefully considering those risks before becoming an online presence.

Some of the risks are obvious, some may not be. Either way, the ABA article tracks some examples of lawyers getting in trouble for their online activities. Two of the more interesting are described here:

• A lawyer requested a continuance due to a death in the family, but the Galveston, Texas, judge checked her Facebook page and discovered news of a week of drinking and partying. The judge, Susan Criss, told lawyers about the episode at the ABA Annual Meeting.

• Lawyer Frank Wilson of San Diego lost his job and got suspended from practice for 45 days for blog postings he wrote as a juror.

(The ABA Article quotes from, and references, a NY Times article that can be found here.)

Leave a Comment »

Leave a Reply

Read Our Comments Policy First


Recent Posts

  • Are You Screening in California? New California Proposed Rule 1.10 Diverges From ABA
  • California Amends Statue of Limitations for Criminal Lawyer Legal Malpractice
  • Advice for New Lawyers
  • Girardi Slapdown Shows How Federal Courts Apply Sanctions Analysis Against Attorneys
  • Ediscovery Sanctions Compromise the Attorney-Client Relationship

Categories

  • ABA
  • Advertising
  • Arbitration
  • Attorney Fees
  • Attorney Pay
  • Attorney-Client Privilege
  • Bar Admission
  • Bar Discipline
  • Business Transactions with Clients
  • Campaign Finance
  • CLE
  • Collaborative Law
  • Communication
  • Comparative Ethics
  • Confidentiality
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Criminal Law
  • Disbarred Lawyers
  • Discipline Proceedings
  • Discovery Disputes
  • Due Process
  • E-Discovery
  • Electronic Issues
  • Email
  • Engagement Letters
  • Ethics Rules
  • Fee Disputes
  • Fixed Fees
  • Impairment
  • Inadvertent Production
  • International Legal Practice
  • Judicial Ethics
  • Law Firm Risk Management
  • Law Firms
  • Law School
  • Lawyers Helping Lawyers Award
  • Lawyers/Judges and Accountants
  • Lawyers/Judges and Doctors
  • Legal Assistant
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Legal Malpractice and Risk Management Conference
  • Management Issues
  • Metadata
  • Missouri
  • Multiple Client
  • Neglect
  • Oregon
  • Paralegal
  • Personal Conflicts
  • Positional or Issue Conflicts
  • Practice Tools
  • Pro Se
  • Professionalism
  • Proposed Legislation
  • Prosecutor Ethics
  • Reciprocity (Admission by Motion)
  • Represented Parties
  • Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Sanctions Analysis
  • Sexual Relations with Clients
  • Social Networking Sites
  • State Specific
  • Supreme Court
  • Suspended Lawyers
  • Trial Publicity
  • Trust Accounts
  • Unauthorized practice of law
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington
  • Withdrawal

Tags

ABA Ethics Rules Advertising Attorney-Client Privilege Attorney Advertising Attorney Fees Bankruptcy california CLE client communication Client Trust Account Cloud Computing Confidentiality Conflicts Conflicts of Interest Criminal Law Discipline E-Discovery Email Employee Theft Engagement Letter Ethics Rules Facebook Fixed Fees Flat Fees Judicial Ethics Lawyer Advertising Lawyer Discipline Lawyer Ethics Lawyer Risk Management Legal Malpractice Metadata New Jersey New York New York Lawyer Ethics Rules Ninth Circuit Pro Se Lawyers Rule 1.10 Rules of Professional Conduct State Legal Ethics Opinions Stress Suspended Lawyers Theft Unauthorized practice of law UPL www.LMRM.com

Blogroll

  • Avoid a Claim
  • Blazer’s Edge
  • Dennis Kennedy
  • Downey on Law Practice
  • Freivogel on Conflicts
  • Inter Alia
  • Internet Cases
  • Legal Ethics Forum
  • Practical Ediscovery

Copyright © 2008 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP.